Apple Live Text vs Google Lens: Detailed Comparison

Amid the many new features in iOS fifteen, some might sound similar little changes merely are really helpful in your everyday use. Whether it is screen sharing in FaceTime, iCloud+, offline Siri, etc., there are plenty of new features to explore. One such feature in iOS xv is Live Text, which Apple showed off at WWDC 2021. And then, if you are wondering whether Live Text is as skilful every bit Google Lens, here is a detailed comparison of Apple's Live Text vs Google Lens.

Apple tree Live Text vs Google Lens: Best Prototype Recognition Tool? (2021)

We will compare Live Text vs Google Lens on multiple fronts in this article. We will be discussing language support, offline availability, and other features of both Live Text and Google Lens. Every bit always, utilize the table of contents below to navigate betwixt the different sections in this article.

What is Alive Text in iOS 15?

For anyone who hasn't watched Apple tree's developer conference, let me give you a quick overview of the new Live Text feature in iOS 15.

Basically, one time you lot install iOS fifteen on your iPhone, your device will be able to identify text within pictures – that likewise straight from the photographic camera. That mode, you tin copy-paste stuff from the real earth, look up that concern you lot took a picture of, and more. It'due south essentially Google Lens but from Apple tree.

Live Text vs Google Lens: What Can It Practice (Basic Features)

To kick things off, permit's take a await at the basic features offered by both Live Text and Google Lens. That way, we can meet which out of the two brings more to the table correct off the bat.

• Apple Live Text

Apple Live Text, as I mentioned higher up, can identify text, phone numbers, emails, etc., from pictures in your gallery, too as straight from the camera app. At that place'due south as well Visual Lookup, which can identify animals and well-known landmarks, and so you lot can get more than information about them by tapping on them via your viewfinder.

Once you have identified text in a moving-picture show, you tin utilize it in a diverseness of ways. Obviously, you tin can copy-paste the text wherever yous would like, but there's more that you tin can do. If you have identified an email, Live Text volition directly give you lot an option to create a new electronic mail to that address. You volition get the selection to call if the text identified is a telephone number, open any identified accost in Apple Maps, and more.

At that place'south also translation born thanks to the Apple Translate app. Y'all can tap on the "Interpret" button in the popular-up context carte to translate the identified text into English (or any of the supported languages).

Peradventure most useful for me is the fact that Live Text tin understand when there's a tracking number in a picture show, and can let you directly open the tracking link, which is quite impressive.

• Google Lens

On the other hand, Google Lens can exercise a lot of slap-up things besides. Obviously, it can place text within images or direct from your photographic camera app. You can then copy-paste the highlighted text, or, like to Live Text, brand a phone phone call, send an electronic mail, and more than. You tin can also create a new calendar consequence direct from Google Lens, which can come in handy.

Some other neat characteristic of Google Lens is business concern card scanning. If someone hands you their business organisation card, you lot tin browse it with Google Lens, and you will get the option to add together a new contact with all their details filled in automatically. That'south really absurd, and it's something we oft used while attending launch events and networking with people.

Now, Alive Text'due south Visual Lookup characteristic may be able to place famous landmarks, books, animals, etc., merely Google Lens is on a whole other level when it comes to object recognition.

Thanks to Google's expertise with search, and paradigm search, Google Lens tin tap into all that knowledge and identify pretty much any object y'all see effectually yous. Whether information technology's a plant, pen, or a bag you spotted your favorite celebrity wearing. Just scan the picture with Google Lens, and yous will become search results for it. That'south a absurd feature of Google Lens that Apple's Live Text/ Visual Lookup doesn't take.

Moreover, Google Lens can also help you with your homework. That's another thing that Live Text simply can't do. You can scan a math trouble with Google Lens, and it volition give you step-past-step solutions for information technology. It also works for other subjects, including physics, biology, history, chemistry, and more.

Clearly, Google Lens has style more features on offer than Apple tree's Live Text does at this signal. Hopefully, Apple volition make Live Text more useful and add more features into the mix as the years go by. But as of right now, Google Lens is more feature-rich and offers more capabilities than Live Text.

Live Text vs Google Lens: Integration

Moving on, let's talk almost the integration of these image recognition features into the operating organisation equally a whole. Well, Apple has always had a unique focus on integrated experiences, and that extends to Live Text too.

On your iPhone, running iSO 15, Live Text is broiled into the default Photos app, besides as the camera. While that's also the example for Google Lens on Android phones, the difference is that you have to tap to enable Google Lens in order to outset scanning text, objects, or whatever else you lot are trying to do. Live Text, on the other hand, is pretty much always on. You tin just long-press on the text you lot are trying to copy-paste or the phone number you want to phone call, and y'all can get on with it.

What's more, Alive Text is also comes baked into iOS fifteen itself. So, if yous are using a messaging app like WhatsApp, or any other app like Notes, or the email app on iPhone, and want to scan and paste some text from the real world, you can use the "Text from Camera" feature to input the text directly. Check out this feature in action right here:

A similar feature exists with Google Lens also, merely in that case, you will accept to get-go switch over to your camera app, head into Google Lens, browse the text and re-create it, and then go dorsum to the original app and paste it there. That'southward a lot of actress steps that you don't demand to bother yourself with if you are using Live Text.

Apple is usually actually good at integrating its features into the devices it sells, and Live Text is no exception. It works wherever you need it to, and makes itself useful in means that you will want to utilize it. I can't say the same for Google Lens in Android, peculiarly not in everyday use.

Clearly, Live Text is amend in this regard, but I hope Google Lens brings a similar kind of integration soon. Because when good features are copied from other places, it ends up making the products ameliorate for us, and I'1000 all for information technology.

Live Text vs Google Lens: Accuracy

As far every bit accuracy is concerned, both Google Lens and Apple Live Text are equally good. I take used Google Lens extensively, and I have been using Alive Text on my iPhone for the past couple of days, and I am however to notice any issues with accurateness on either of these image recognition software.

That said, I have noticed that if you are scanning text with Live Text, it sometimes mistakes "O" (the alphabetic character) for a "0" (the digit) and vice-versa. That tin be a trivial abrasive and non something I desire to give a pass to, but considering this is still a beta release, I'yard not going to consider it a large issue.

On the other hand, when information technology comes to object recognition, Google Lens has the complete upper paw. It tin not only identify more than objects and animals than Visual Lookup on an iPhone, simply it'due south as well accurate with the results. Visual Lookup has completely failed at recognizing whatever objects for me, and I even fed it a picture of the Gold Gate Bridge, which is the exact instance Apple used in its WWDC 2021 keynote. But that didn't work either, so clearly, the feature needs a lot of work.

Overall, Google Lens has better accuracy than Apple's Live Text feature in iOS 15. Information technology's, yet, a close competition every bit far as text, emails, phone numbers, etc., are concerned.

Alive Text vs Google Lens: Language Support

Since both Google Lens and Live Text support translation, it'south important to consider which languages they both work in. That besides extends to which languages they can fifty-fifty place text in, and well, when it comes to these metrics, Live Text is miles behind Google Lens.

Here are the languages supported by Live Text for translation:

• English language
• Chinese
• French
• Italian
• German
• Portuguese
• Spanish

On the other mitt, Google Lens supports translation in every language that Google Translate can work with. That is over 103 languages for text translation. In dissimilarity to this number, Apple's 7 language back up fades to pettiness.

Live Text vs Google Lens: Device Back up

Apple's new Live Text characteristic is available on iPhone with iOS fifteen, iPad with iPadOS xv, and macOS 12 Monterey.

Google Lens is available to utilize on all devices with Android half-dozen.0 Marshmallow and above. Plus, information technology is integrated into Google Photos and the Google app, pregnant you tin apply it on iOS devices as well.

It's no surprise that Google Lens is available on more devices than Apple Live Text. However, if you utilise multiple devices and desire a unmarried solution for prototype recognition, Google Lens has a higher chance of being available beyond unlike ecosystems.

Google Lens vs Alive Text: Which 1 Should You Use?

At present that we have gone through all the dissimilar comparing points for both Live Text and Google Lens, the question remains, which i should you apply? That answer will vary from person to person. Equally someone who is deep into the Apple ecosystem, I take used Live Text more in the concluding week than I have e'er used Google Lens. Nevertheless, Google Lens offers unique capabilities that Live Text and Visual Lookup don't.

It all depends on your utilise cases and your workflow. I don't often find myself wondering where I tin buy a pair of jeans that Chris Hemsworth was wearing. Merely I do find myself wanting to add text to my WhatsApp chat without re-create-pasting it off my Mac, and Alive Text lets me practice that way more easily than Google Lens. So, what do y'all recall about Google Lens vs Live Text? Which 1 exercise yous think is amend and why? Permit us know in the comments.

Source: https://beebom.com/apple-live-text-vs-google-lens/

Posted by: maynortenathe.blogspot.com

Share this post